As the cost of LLMs continue to fall, it's time to rethink your strategy.
For years, legacy machine learning (ML) models have powered document classification, entity extraction, and other legal-tech staples. They excel when the problem is well-defined and unchanging, but that strength is also their weakness. Every material change, including new clause types, tweaked metadata, emerging regulations demands a fresh round of data collection, feature engineering, and model retraining. If the algorithm sits inside a vendor’s black box, you wait in line for that update (and hope it’s prioritized).
In short, classic ML is rigid by design: tuned for yesterday’s questions, resistant to tomorrow’s pivots.
Because legacy ML models are static, vendors can amortize training costs and offer false-bottom line starting prices. Over time, those “savings” come with hidden expenses:
For example, traditional machine learning models for clause extraction often rely on fixed keywords, so if a contract uses phrasing like “cessation of obligations” instead of “termination,” the model may miss it entirely. Adapting to new language requires costly retraining with labeled data. In contract, large language models (LLMs) can interpret varied legal language without retraining, recognizing meaning even when phrasing shifts. That flexibility makes them far more scalable and efficient in legal document analysis.
Additionally, the economics of LLMs are moving in the opposite direction. Cloud-scale training, specialized AI hardware, and open-weight distillation are pushing per-document costs down quarter after quarter. While ML costs have flattened, the distance they can travel has become limited. As LLM costs keep falling, each release unlocks qualitatively new skills (long-context reasoning, multilingual fluency, on-the-fly tool use).
If you snapshot today’s pricing, ML can look like the “good-enough, cheaper” option. However, zoom out two to three years and your ROI wanes:
Ask yourself where you want your firm’s knowledge workflows to be when peers using LLM-based solutions are classifying, summarizing, and drafting in real time.
Some vendors recommend applying LLM capabilities to only a slice of your content - “just the KM folder,” or “only the contract templates.” On paper, this tactic controls cost. In practice, it:
Put differently: the real ROI of LLMs comes from a complete knowledge fabric, not a handful of stitched-together patches. Cost controls should come from smart throttling, caching, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), not by shrinking the universe of data your professionals rely on. This only limits the value you can bring to your clients.
At NetDocuments we have woven next-gen LLMs - and the safeguards legal teams require -directly into our platform:
Legal professionals cannot afford to simply keep pace, they are empowered to look around corners for their organizations, to anticipate how technology will inform the future of legal practice. Machine learning may feel like today’s bargain, but it is tomorrow’s bottleneck. And selectively sprinkling modern AI over a sliver of your knowledge base only delays future ballooning costs and meaningfully limits the value you can bring to your clients.
Ready to see how a full suite of LLM-powered legal AI solutions can unlock new capacity—and new competitive advantages—for your firm? Let’s talk!